Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Burden of proof for what?

First 32725 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Lomu

15,434 Posts.

37

26/04/24

19:32

Post #: 73531146
Share

Originally posted by Quatrojos ↑

I can't find any evidence to support the idea that the logarithm doesn't apply. Nor can I find any evidence to support the idea that the hydrological cycle is sensitised to increased [CO2]. But you seem to be sure that it is, which is why I'm asking. There's a burden of proof and it weighs against you, not me...

Expand

Burden of proof for what?
Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 678 more messages in this thread...

First 32725 Last

SPONSORED BY