I provided some of the science that disputes the consensus. It seems, though, that a very effective way for alarmist scientists to censor the more cool-headed' research is to ignore it, rather than critique it with the 'slings and arrows' you mentioned in a previous post. This suits their 'science is settled' mantra, along with refusal to debate the 'sceptics'.
You refuse to discuss the science. You opt to respond with appeals to authority and ad hominem attacks. Your record of this stretches out for all to see: 15402 abusive, low-quality, comments. Hot Copper is a stock trading and investment forum. It seems clear to me that you aren't here to discuss stocks. You are political. Your refusal to discuss science leads me to believe that your conviction re climate change is political. Let me know when you're ready to swallow some science!
