Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

As it would take 10+ years to get the first Nuclear Reactor...

First 33908 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
SonicBlast

10,423 Posts.

39

20/05/24

12:05

Post #: 73911676
Share

Originally posted by bellcurve: ↑

@SonicBlast

repeated studies have clearly shown the cost of nuclear power generation is way more than power from renewable sources such as solar or wind.

we know this now.

it's a mystery therefore why the conservative xtian losers who favor this technology want it developed.

does the general public then have to pay for the ideological preferences of these conservative xtian losers, who were too timid to have the nuclear debate in the 9 years they held office to 2022.

and what do you make of their support for SMRs. These are small modular reactors that don't even exist yet.

why is this rabble hell bent on making Australians pay high prices for power, when we don't have to.

Expand

As it would take 10+ years to get the first Nuclear Reactor going then the existing Coal PS's would have to have their life extended at the cost of Billions. So all Renewables would be stopped.

Its all about the fossil fool money.
4 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 720 more messages in this thread...

First 33908 Last

SPONSORED BY