Yes the “Imminently” is interesting.Though it all comes down to...

First 34 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
GARETH78

7,824 Posts.

2775

01/05/24

15:48

Post #: 73611915
Share

Originally posted by fooca: ↑

Why why why lol did you engage, you do know that he studies the threads, twists what he reads and then posts his "unbiased" opinions using the information posted, right?
He has obviously given up on the "other thread" being ignored hurts.

But as usual, T20 has got it wrong:
Delisting and the AGM don't go hand in hand!

re: "the company needs to call an AGM within the next 4 weeks as 1 months notice is required,"

The Company is required to hold an AGM within 5 months after the end of its financial year (s250N Corporations Act).
The Company's financial year ended 31st December 2023 and the latest date under the regulations to hold their AGM is 31st May 2024.

As a listed Company, they are required to give a minimum of 28 days notice (not a month) to hold an AGM, thus an announcement to adhere to both the 5 month period and minimum notice needs to be this Friday 3rd May.

Food for thought .....
Under ASX listing rules, a Director by rotation needs to stand for re-election every AGM . .. ..
~ by my calculations, Fraser is up for re-election, he has made no indication if he is in fact going to stand, maybe he won't so having a Director Nominated may prove prudent?

cheers
ps: I am replying to you because apparently I can't see his posts .. .. .. .. .. .. . . belly laugh moment
pps: doing what he does best, posts dribble to disrupt any discussion/debates.

Expand

Yes the “Imminently” is interesting.

Though it all comes down to time scale. This Decade? Century? Month? Year?

We both know the ATO ruling has been a furphy to make everyone look busy.

Its like me asking the ATO for a NOA without lodging my return.

Nonsense.

Last edited by GARETH78: 01/05/24

FFX Price at posting: 20.0¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
6 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply