Making declamatory statements is perhaps how high school...

Making declamatory statements is perhaps how high school debaters argue but in the adult world qualifiers are used.

You keep going on about backpack explosions. The damage from same and cost to society will not be great. Risk mangement involves consideration of cost rather than just frequency. Greater frequency does not mean you ignore more substantial cost risks. Why would I refute a red herring. I aknowledged same and tried to broaden the discussion to include a wide range of circumstances where use was applicable, including non lethal attacks and activites that could be described broadly as espionage.

But sure you win as its so important to you. Trials dont lead to contracts, Home office in UK isnt installing systems., the French are going to mothball their system after the olympics, Singapore police having capabilites is just a pr stunt., voltaile areas arent less complacent than other areas and hence early adopters, issues with current sytems dont explain delays in adoption but mean they will never be used and mobile response systems dont count now has to be a fixxed installation.. Oh and air defence sytems are liable for collateral damage.

Goodbye. On ignore. Your deliberate use of perjorative phrasing and isinuation annoys me ( but you know that) and at my age I dont need it.