Ann: Investor Presentation - RIU Explorers Conference, page-29

Using the previously published trays as a guide, the wooden blocks appear to have a coding system of drill hole, two depths (back and front side?) and an overall drill depth. For example you had DD024 with a 3.0; 3.0; 171.5 block. 0.1m deeper the pegmatite started at 171.6m. Viewing the trays this way, the top is towards the surface and lower gets deeper.

Ok so lets apply this to our unknown DD trays. They are labelled TGRCD-043. That's the standard labelling you would expect from an RC extension with a DD tail. Its consistent with the naming TG6 used for TGRCD09. TG6 is still being careful with the cash so they would have had a nearby RC hole that hit something interesting to warrant stopping the RC drilling and adding a DD tail at this exploratory stage. That indicates one of the pair's of drilling and possibly one with no white signature because the RC43 drilling was intentionally a duster.

The wooden block below would appear to be 3.0/3.0 and 15X with X being either a 0 or 6. It might be 156.5m but its hard to tell. With this being tray 21, then the DD would need to have started in the 70m's. The first few trays could be waste malfic rock. RC22 and RC28 wouldn't indicate a pegmatite at this depth. The depth start would also rule out a strangely named DD extension of any existing reported hole.

There's no sign of the black drill malfic at either the top or bottom of the string of trays. The likelihood of the pegmatite join being at the start/end of both the trays is low. Either there's some more trays to this drill hole sequence or selected trays from multiple drill holes are presented and the angles mean you just can't read the "higher" trays. It is a photo known to be going into presentations so both are possible but I just don't think misleading staged photo's are TG6's style.


There's little point in a post like this without speculation on where it is but confidence in this guess is low. If these pegmatites are dipping at 50-75m down-hole and the soil anomaly is caused by the surface expression, the circled area below could have the right sort of depths. If this was the case, RC0017 was incredibly close to having a robust mid-depth intercept. It would have just been a little too far to the left. It may have however pointed towards interesting stresses or changes in the geology. The first drill hole 200m north of RC017 may have then clipped the pegmatite (if it thumped straight through, the drilling would have been a DD twin). RC043 thumped straight through it. We wait!!