MCT are some 50 Kms away and have more reliable (probably)...

MCT are some 50 Kms away and have more reliable (probably) cobalt numbers from surface and thin drill intersections. I have not seen the host lithologies mentioned - anyone else have any idea whether they are similar to Tabac or are they mafic hosts?

RHM and others have reported surface Co pXRF geochem values 170m above the "disputed" 80m of 0.7% Co in PP011.

IMO these occurrences are like apples pears and oranges. They are all fruit that could end up being from a big orchard(?s) somewhere or just a few stunted trees scattered around along with a few patches of grapefruit or figs elsewhere.

In geology terms: possible mafic Co deposits; DRC style sedimentary variant and perhaps others. Some of the cobalt is real so the question becomes is any going to be economic.

How can something be a con unless there is critical information purposefully with held? RIR have provided their interpretation of data which is publicly available. Their interpretation is speculative and JK/RIR would probably agree it could be wrong. Could be right as well.....

Others hold different views and may say it was a con if RIR come up with low cobalt. If there is cobalt - silence.

Does anyone really know at the moment?