Not sure how you figure that. They would have paid for a third of both wells and we would currently have 55% of the project instead of the 80% we have now. If the wells cost $50m for both Cluff would have kicked in around $17m (assuming there was no cap on well costs). With the raisings done since, that $17m probably would have been about 2oom shares. Do you think losing 25% of the project to save 200m shares would have been a good deal?
Not sure how you figure that. They would have paid for a third...
Add IVZ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
6.8¢ |
Change
-0.001(1.45%) |
Mkt cap ! $96.41M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 6.9¢ | 6.9¢ | 6.8¢ | $47.32K | 691.6K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 226586 | 6.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 6.9¢ | 99054 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 11.08am 17/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
6.8¢ |
Change
-0.001 ( 2.86 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 6.8¢ | 6.8¢ | 6.8¢ | 246997 | ||
| Last updated 10.30am 17/05/2024 ? | |||||
| IVZ (ASX) Chart |