TLG - Media, page-14215

Leading Edge tried to cut corners. I've covered this here: Post #: 70179145

"Bergsstaten motivates their decision that their opinion is that a Natura 2000 permit is required prior to Bergsstaten being able to evaluate the mining lease application."

LEM then appealed to the Government and that is when the Supreme Administrative Court became involved.

Mark Thompson is fully aware of Norra Karr and how that played out. So, how will this be a problem for Talga when they are doing things in the correct order? If the Supreme Court does not grant leave to appeal, that means the decision to uphold the permits (including the Natura 2000) is final. They are then able to apply for the exploitation concession.