36 impartial or dishonest?They weren't quick to say they could...

  1. 21,015 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 178
    36 impartial or dishonest?

    They weren't quick to say they could not be impartial.

    "Sixty of 96 potential jurors were quick to say they could not be impartial after proceedings began on Monday."

    Odds of people with massive political bias trying to get onto the jury, almost certain.

    So therefore almost certain there won't be a jury?
    12 jurors won't be found and no back ups?

    Hung jury?

    Trump can hope.
    It's a possibility.
    Could nearly have happend with E. Jean Carroll trial. Juror 77 fell in line.






 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.