seriously this is a non event .. watso was particularly referring to testimony by some guy called pecker and how there was a plan to control the narrative blah blah ..
overnight, there was the news of weinstein having a win - and the case against him involved some guy called Alvin Bragg .. mmm the name rings a bell in relation to trump - was the first thought that popped into watso's mind ..
anyway .. this from theGATEWAY
It’s no secret Harvey Weinstein is a despicable human being. But that doesn’t mean prosecutors get free reign. New York’s highest court ruled the judge tainted the jury by allowing witness to testify about subjects that had nothing to do with the case against him. This is exactly what is happening in the New York court room where President Trump is being tried on a sham records keeping case.
For 3 days the CEO of the National Enquirer has been testifying about things that have nothing to do with the underlying allegations against Trump. His testimony is only to serve as a way to make the jury think President Trump is unscrupulous. It amounts to a prosecutorial trick. If New York’s highest court rules that these types of witnesses, that serve only to taint the minds of the jury, are wrong in a convicted sex offender case, it should be wrong in a case against a former President.
a video at the link .. watso only watched the first few minutes - but well worth it
anyway .. see how it goes.. but watso did write this
the few times that watso has commented on the matter - watso has always inferred that this trial is total rubbish .. a total non event blah blah blah ..
and forget that JUSTICE MATTERS clown ...
watso despises bully boy america .. does not matter who the potus is ..
anyway - watso is more confident that he has made the correct call in this case - just like he has made the correct call - time and time again ..
