Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

By what metric did you determine that the split wasn't along...

First 145 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Reaper11

20,237 Posts.

62

18/10/23

09:30

Post #: 70398401
Share

Originally posted by Treefern: ↑

Waleed thought it meant something, but it didn't. They didn't split along educational lines at all, they split along regional -v- urban lines, and a higher proportion of city dwellers have tertiary degrees. The example I used to show how stupid his thinking was is that the Yes vote had a much higher propensity to use public transport than the No vote. It's even more stark than education, but Waleed didn't have anything to say about it, presumably because he didn't think it useful to highlight those who drive their own car to work :/

Expand

By what metric did you determine that the split wasn't along both lines: Education and Regional vs urban?

Reaper.
Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 43 more messages in this thread...

First 145 Last

SPONSORED BY