"There's no contention that unless they can change expenditure...

First 12544 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Footmax

13,592 Posts.

2245

15/05/24

13:41

Post #: 73836084
Share

"There's no contention that unless they can change expenditure some form of cash injection will be required in near term."

You really are stuck in your thought processes.

NO - They have to raise funds - not "IF' or "UNLESS X happens". Why do you refuse to accept that?

Like talking to a wall:_)

You are refusing to rid yourself of the idea that some sort of deal is being negotiated. They can't as they need the trial results to do that. We are going around in circles.

The "tech" you talk about is actually unproven - and any proof of concept is tied up with the trial results - and they may be in the next financial year.

In any case, how long do you think it can potentially take to nail down any deal or TO - A recent example I can give took over 12 months.

Originally posted by Pseudoname1: ↑

Hey Footmax,

Point is I'm more interested in Tech than CR, Capital is needed to run a business, they're running the business to build the Tech. Hard to see the issue on a prima facie basis.

Nuance here is they don't raise huge chunks of money because of staging.

Per previous - if they had $50M in bank your theory is "that's good", my theory is they've had money I could have deployed elsewhere. I actually think this approach is considerate of SH and logical. Demonstrate progress, raise for next.

There's no contention that unless they can change expenditure some form of cash injection will be required in near term.

No point trying to twist it into egg on face imagery. The real egg on face will be if we get an announcement of T/O or Sponsorship. That's the point of contention. There's little insight in saying I can read numbers and divide one number by another. Not the most engaging conversation tbh.

I think there's a lot of conjecture around what been funded and what has not. Idk the precise answer to that

So to keep it simple -

1) where will money come from - does it have to be CR. I'm not assuming- are you ?
2) At what price would hypothetical CR be done? Assuming its low are you ? I'm not assuming

I've never met a C suite who couldn't tell me their approximate cash forecast straight off. SO if we assume these guys are the same, and we assume POSTIVE RESULTS means something like positive results, why do you assume they wont at least try to get results out first?

Its not that you're wrong its just amateur hour stuff mate, it may go that way but I don't think that's what they're shooting for. IMO they know HIV is good, they've had a shout at the CRO and want it out this quarter to showcase (or better)

Who might they be showcasing it to, if they haven't off the data they likely have already.

No desperation from me here btw, just an interesting read, exciting potential.

JMHO

DYOR

Expand

BIT Price at posting: 5.9¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
1 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply