Agree, the advertising about "net zero" , the critical minerals...

First 170 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Dyno

2,141 Posts.

248

16/05/24

08:14

Post #: 73848075
Share

Originally posted by Foibles: ↑

Whilst I'm a long way off buying most of the talk in this place about international market manipulation, burgeoning Chinese demand, "silver to the moon", 'if silver was a crypto with the right pronouns' etc.... the one thing that I am comfortable with is that bowdens will be approved.

For mine (pun intended) it is a lay down misere.

still... it's only my view, dyor etc etc...but one can't help but notice the recent NSW government advertising blitz on TV testing the societal benefits of mining. All the sites they use in these ads are metalliferous, no O&G, no coal, etc. silver is one of those activities that doesn't attract unceasing hatred or protestation the way coal, big oil or gas does.

so that mob can spout whatever (rather baseless it would seem) scare campaign they like....it doesn't shake my confidence one iota.

Expand

Agree, the advertising about "net zero" , the critical minerals sector, is heating up and we all know why, not to repeat it again... the govt plans to chuck a pile of cash at ARU as it would have no hope of finance, QPM has had to resort to drilling for gas to survive and put it's nickel refining project on ice. They're not exactly silver, but as important in the Electrification uptake as SVL is. There are a few more, in a similar situation but you get the idea.

SVL is shovel ready, just requiring the last couple of rubber stamps and some $ finance. I believe it will go ahead too, and it won't need Billions for processing plants like the others do..

All imho.

SVL Price at posting: 20.0¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
2 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply