Oh, Yes, of course, that is very convincing. But one last...

  1. 349 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 2

    Oh, Yes, of course, that is very convincing. But one last question,if I may.

    Is it not on thepublic record that the police have a witness who claims that Brittanywas in the habit of having sex in that very same minister’s office?And didn’t Brittany boast that she wanted a sex scandal, apparentlyimplicating the Liberal Party. And didn’t Brittany have close LaborParty friends? How did such a person get placed in a Minister’soffice with no significant experience in the job? It sounds to methat BH was infiltrated into Liberal Party with the intent to wreckthe joint. As the old socialist saying goes “If you can’t run it,wreck it”.

    The “evidence”from her workmates supporting Brittany’s story all suggestscollusion to bring down Bruce IMHO. Why? Maybe it just started as a“Get Bruce” game with no special motive, but it spiralled out ofcontrol when the police got involved. And the liars then have to keeplying.

    One witness claimedto have seen Bruce “getting handsy” with Brittany. Prettyincriminating stuff it would seem. But it collapsed when Brittanyrepudiated this story under oath.

    I wonder if thepolice have the phone records of all those who gave evidence. Is aninitial game of “Get Bruce” ruled out?


 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.